Technical Paper: Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks, how did this help with Transformers
The paper "Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks" is a landmark work by Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V. Le, published in 2014. It introduced a general approach to handling sequence-to-sequence problems using neural networks, specifically using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs).
Summary of the Paper
Problem:
Traditional neural networks struggled with tasks where the input and output were sequences of different lengths (e.g., machine translation, speech recognition).
Solution:
The authors proposed a model with two main components:
-
Encoder RNN:
- Processes the input sequence (e.g., a sentence in English) one step at a time.
- At each step, it updates its hidden state.
- After the entire sequence is read, the final hidden state is a fixed-size vector representation of the input sequence.
-
Decoder RNN:
- Takes the fixed-size vector from the encoder as input.
- Generates the output sequence (e.g., sentence in French) one token at a time.
- The decoder also uses its own hidden states and previously generated outputs.
Key Innovations:
-
Handling Variable Length Input and Output: The encoder-decoder framework naturally handles sequences of varying lengths.
-
Reversing Input Sequences: The authors found that reversing the input sequence improves the optimization process, likely because it reduces the "distance" between corresponding input and output tokens.
-
Use of LSTMs (Long Short-Term Memory): They used LSTM cells in both encoder and decoder to handle long-range dependencies and vanishing gradient problems.
Applications:
- Machine Translation (primary focus)
- Speech Recognition
- Text Summarization
- Chatbots
Impact:
This paper laid the groundwork for many subsequent advancements in natural language processing (NLP) and sequence learning. It was foundational before the rise of Transformer-based models like BERT and GPT.
Link to PDF:
You can access the official paper here:
📄 Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks (PDF)
How did Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks, how did this help with Transformers.
1. Sequence-to-Sequence (Seq2Seq) Idea → Core Problem Definition
- The Seq2Seq framework formalized the problem of mapping one sequence to another.
- Example: Translating "Hello World" (English) → "Bonjour le monde" (French).
✅ Impact on Transformers:
- Transformers also solve the same Seq2Seq problem but replace RNNs with a more efficient mechanism (attention).
2. Encoder-Decoder Architecture → Structural Inspiration
- The paper introduced the Encoder-Decoder architecture:
- Encoder: Compresses the input sequence into a fixed-size context vector.
- Decoder: Generates the output sequence from that vector.
✅ Impact on Transformers:
- Transformers kept the Encoder-Decoder design but improved the components:
- Replacing RNNs with self-attention layers.
- Allowing more parallelism and handling long-range dependencies better.
3. Bottleneck Problem → Motivation for Attention
- Problem in Seq2Seq RNNs:
- The entire input sequence is squeezed into one fixed-size vector (context vector).
- This limits the model’s ability to handle long sequences (information bottleneck).
✅ Impact on Transformers:
- This bottleneck led to the introduction of Attention Mechanisms:
- Instead of relying solely on one vector, attention allows the decoder to directly access all encoder outputs at each step.
- First seen in Bahdanau Attention (2015), directly influenced by the weaknesses of this Seq2Seq paper.
- Transformers take attention further → they are built entirely on self-attention, no RNNs at all.
4. Handling Variable Length Sequences
- Seq2Seq made it clear that:
- Traditional neural networks can’t handle variable-length input/output easily.
- Encoder-decoder solves it.
✅ Impact on Transformers:
- Transformers also naturally handle variable-length sequences, continuing this capability but improving efficiency.
5. Long-Term Dependencies → Transformer’s Breakthrough
- Even though LSTMs (used in Seq2Seq) help with long-term dependencies, they are sequential in nature → hard to parallelize and still struggle with very long sequences.
✅ Impact on Transformers:
- Transformers removed recurrence entirely, using attention to model relationships regardless of distance.
- Enabled parallel processing, making training faster.
Summary:
| Seq2Seq with RNNs (2014) | Transformers (2017) |
|---|---|
| Encoder-Decoder architecture | Encoder-Decoder retained |
| Bottlenecked by fixed-size vector | Attention over all inputs eliminates bottleneck |
| Uses RNNs (LSTMs) → sequential | Uses self-attention → parallelizable |
| Handles variable-length sequences | Handles variable-length sequences |
| Struggles with long-term dependencies | Attention solves long dependencies efficiently |
Direct Lineage:
- Seq2Seq Paper (2014) → defined the architecture.
- Attention Mechanism (Bahdanau et al., 2015) → solved bottlenecks.
- Transformer (Vaswani et al., 2017) → built fully on attention, no RNNs.
Link to Technical Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.3215
Comments
Post a Comment